Connected and autonomous vehicles will provide huge social, industrial and economic benefits to the UK. This report examines how these innovative vehicles will transform the UK economy – expanding our industrial base, improving safety and congestion, driving up productivity and freeing up space usually devoted to vehicles in our urban areas.
Bibliotheek
In deze bibliotheek vind u producten, documenten, presentaties, rapporten en artikelen die relevant zijn voor de ontwikkeling van smart Mobility oplossingen. Voorbeelden van producten: richtlijnen, handreikingen, normen, architecturen, standaarden en afsprakensets, methodes/ bewezen werkwijzen, lessons learned, overzichten van relevante publicaties, gezamenlijke standpunten (positionpapers, fiches), notities met gedragen adviezen over vervolgaanpak, bereikte overeenstemming of een gedragen analyse, vertaling naar wet- en regelgeving, aanbestedingen. Daarnaast vindt u relevante informatie zoals presentaties en rapporten van afgeronde en lopende projecten en internationale artikelen mbt de thema’s waar de community S&P aan werkt.
"Limited self-driving trucks are not expected to reach series-production readiness before 2025. The technology is almost there, but legal hurdles have to be overcome", states Sebastian Gundermann, Partner in the Automotive Competence Center. > From a technical perspective, the main need for innovation is on the software side.
According to Article 17(4) of the ITS Directive, the Commission must submit a report every three years to the European Parliament and to the Council on the progress made in the implementation of the Directive. It is to be accompanied by an analysis of the functioning and implementation of Articles 5 to 11 and Article 16, including the financial resources used and needed.
agenda bijeenkomst ronde tafel Architectuur en interoperabiliteit van 18 april 2016
The innovative technology of autonomous vehicles brings an unaddressed legal issue: how will legal liability be assessed when these cars collide with other cars, pedestrians, or property? Current law surrounding liability for automobile accidents largely bases liability on the actions of the driver.
This paper provides a discussion of how products liability law will impact autonomous vehicles, and provides a set of guiding principles for legislation that should—and that should not—be enacted. In some very specific, narrow respects, state-level legislative clarity regarding autonomous vehicle liability can be beneficial.
In order to grasp the variety of use cases and specifications for autonomous driving, proxies are sought, which on the one hand make use of distinguishing characteristics, and on the other hand describe typical usage scenarios for autonomous driving. Besides the nomenclature, the use cases are defined by their distinguishing characteristics.
This paper examines the technological and non-technological liabilities of autonomous vehicles, as well as policy aspects of robocars, using the Google self-driving car as an example. Self-driving cars have the potential to reduce the number of accidents and associated deaths and economic losses, but only if they are highly reliable.
Nearly all of the literature on self-driving cars explores either their impact on social values, like freedom and privacy, or the questions they pose for legal liability. These lines of inquiry have developed largely in isolation, with little effort to examine how they might intersect and inform each other.
The emergence of autonomous vehicles presents many legal questions. Particularly, how should liability, absent statutory or regulato-ry directive, be assessed and apportioned when an autonomous vehicle, under automatic control, gets into an accident that is not clearly the fault of another vehicle?