THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION, Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91 thereof, Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee ( 1 ), Having consulted the Committee of the Regions, Acting in accordance with the ordinar
Bibliotheek
Er zijn 781 resultaten gevonden. 91 - 100 van 781
In deze bibliotheek vind u producten, documenten, presentaties, rapporten en artikelen die relevant zijn voor de ontwikkeling van smart Mobility oplossingen. Voorbeelden van producten: richtlijnen, handreikingen, normen, architecturen, standaarden en afsprakensets, methodes/ bewezen werkwijzen, lessons learned, overzichten van relevante publicaties, gezamenlijke standpunten (positionpapers, fiches), notities met gedragen adviezen over vervolgaanpak, bereikte overeenstemming of een gedragen analyse, vertaling naar wet- en regelgeving, aanbestedingen. Daarnaast vindt u relevante informatie zoals presentaties en rapporten van afgeronde en lopende projecten en internationale artikelen mbt de thema’s waar de community S&P aan werkt.
The emergence of autonomous vehicles presents many legal questions. Particularly, how should liability, absent statutory or regulato-ry directive, be assessed and apportioned when an autonomous vehicle, under automatic control, gets into an accident that is not clearly the fault of another vehicle?
Nearly all of the literature on self-driving cars explores either their impact on social values, like freedom and privacy, or the questions they pose for legal liability. These lines of inquiry have developed largely in isolation, with little effort to examine how they might intersect and inform each other.
This paper examines the technological and non-technological liabilities of autonomous vehicles, as well as policy aspects of robocars, using the Google self-driving car as an example. Self-driving cars have the potential to reduce the number of accidents and associated deaths and economic losses, but only if they are highly reliable.
In order to grasp the variety of use cases and specifications for autonomous driving, proxies are sought, which on the one hand make use of distinguishing characteristics, and on the other hand describe typical usage scenarios for autonomous driving. Besides the nomenclature, the use cases are defined by their distinguishing characteristics.
This paper provides a discussion of how products liability law will impact autonomous vehicles, and provides a set of guiding principles for legislation that should—and that should not—be enacted. In some very specific, narrow respects, state-level legislative clarity regarding autonomous vehicle liability can be beneficial.
The innovative technology of autonomous vehicles brings an unaddressed legal issue: how will legal liability be assessed when these cars collide with other cars, pedestrians, or property? Current law surrounding liability for automobile accidents largely bases liability on the actions of the driver.
agenda bijeenkomst ronde tafel Architectuur en interoperabiliteit van 18 april 2016
presentatie gezien vanuit de Nedelandse context over de beoogde C-ITS referentiearchitectuur van het hoogste niveau, inzetbaar binnen een afgesproken werkgebied en gebaseerd op internationale standaarden.
Presentatie over de resultaten van de voormalige Ronde Tafel Dutch Profile / standaardisatie. Deze Ronde Tafel is nu onderdeel van Architectuur & Interoperabiliteit.